The Conversation

It is the first day of the new year.
Are you welcome or not? I hope so.
We could also make it a question: Have you arrived at the new year?

Having thus arrived at a new calendar year according to the Gregorian calendar, we could choose to look back or look forward. It will probably be both, since we have both a windshield and a rear window in our vehicles. Some even have a sunroof. Others have a hole in the bottom so that they can see both the asphalt and the hedgehogs that have been run over. Welcome to the Flintstones mobile.

We could also consider switching from the Papal calendar to the Holocene calendar, which would mean that we are now living in the year 12,024 after the end of the Ice Age. That would make some sense, since civilization as we know it arose from here. There is also a civilization that we do not yet know about. But that is a completely different topic.
Or what about the Byzantine calendar, which has calculated that the World was created on March 25, 5493 BC? Which means that we are now living in the year 7493. That is worth considering.

A quick observation from the year-that-gak.
The Mummy 2.0 then threw in the towel on December 31, 2023 at 6:10 p.m. About f.t… On the other hand: Who cares? Will it be any better if Prince Pilfinger and HMS Mary are launched. A mother’s boy can’t do anything. Good thing you weren’t born a royal canary with clipped wings in a golden cage.
Read: The stupid New Year’s speech

Last year was without a doubt the most absurd year in the memory of mankind.
It was the culmination of a world that went crazy.
It was the arena of absurdities.
That was the bottom line of the stupidest age in human history.
With reason, conversation also went down the drain.
We used to say: There’s nothing to talk about.
So what IS there to talk about?
There’s A LOT to talk about, and we’d better get started.

The turn of the year

I had an interesting New Year’s Eve myself, and I will remember it for a whole series of intense conversations with interesting people that I had. I will also remember it for the fact that there was one person in the party who I did not have a conversation with and who did not think I should have conversations with people. Interesting, right? Why would anyone be interested in that? I will not reveal where I was, who I was talking to, or who Mrs. Shut-Your-Mouth was, only that it was quite clear that an attempt was being made to attack someone – and now I am using the term: a psychic vampire, an energy parasite. The lady did not succeed, because I discovered her, established a shield and continued the conversations. For the rest of the evening, she constantly circled around me and the people I had chosen to talk to – or who had chosen me. She was ignored and distanced, because that is the only thing you can do with energy vampires. Never engage in dialogue with psychopaths. Keep your distance while being observant.

The subject of conversation is thus dual in nature - based on this case story from the turn of the year.
On the one hand: There is the conversation, its invaluable meaning and importance.
On the other hand: There is conversation blocking and reasons why we talk far too little, even when we think we are having a conversation. We overlook that someone is either monitoring, limiting, interfering, controlling or interrupting the conversation and subsequently preventing new and real conversations from occurring.
Not that interfering in a conversation itself is odious. It can be particularly conducive if the intention can be formulated as: Hi, I can hear that you are trying to circle me on something that I have also been interested in and have a certain interest in, and I just want to offer an angle on it that you might be able to use - if that is OK? In other words, an open, considerate, constructive, curious and respectful intervention, where you show situational awareness and courtesy.

Intervention and new speak

Unfortunately, it could also be something else: An intervention, a show-stopper. A few years ago, a strange word was introduced in the business management context: Disruption. It was one of those words that had a poisonous taste and smell of a linguistic implant. These words arrive at regular intervals. They are planted with a motive by someone who wants us to take them in our mouth, someone who wants to steer us in a certain direction. And someone who definitely doesn’t play with open cards, because if we found out what they were up to, they could be thrown out the door. THEY would be disrupted. In management newspeak terminology, it meant interrupting something that had meaning - and here comes another implant word: unsustainable, because we know that (new speak again) innovation is by definition good.

It was not a case of something being judged unsustainable after a survey or a number of inquiries, and then a signal was given for innovation, because now the established system had just started to function after many adjustments, after management had done the same thing years ago. That something that is new by definition should be good is just as muddled and falsely logical as that something that is old should be good by definition. In fact, the chance that the old is better is greater, because what is the definition of tradition? A definition could be, for example: Experiments that work. The result is that the employees in the company were pissed off that they had spent so much energy loyally learning the system, which was now being pulled out from under them because the new CEO had to show his power of action. Ask the elementary school teachers about every time there is a smart elementary school reform, so that they once again have to twist and turn and blow like political windsocks.

These new words are in the same category as the concept of being progressive. Progress is by definition good, without any further argument being needed. So, an idiot stands at the edge of a cliff with a vertical drop of 100 meters and declares: I am progressive! Well, yes, just take a step forward, but don’t force everyone else to do it. Which is what the members of the progressive religion always try to do.

Disruption is interruption. Is it appropriate to interrupt projects that are on the way to dragging people’s well-being over the edge? We don’t even need to talk about that (it’s nothing to talk about). Anyone with a modicum of common sense (and common sense is not that common these days) can agree. That’s what is appealed to with the expression everyone knows that … It then requires that everyone is allowed and given time to understand it, and that the common understanding is formed in an open, unstressed and unmanipulated conversation space. Common sense is only healthy in a healthy environment.

Interesting how a microscopic nuance completely changes the meaning:
It’s nothing to talk about = you don’t have to think about it, you don’t have to make anything out of it, it’s an insignificant trifle.
There is nothing to talk about = you have no right to object, it will be as it is, because we have decided that for you.

It should not be easy for foreigners to learn your native language …

Synthetic consensus

Another term arrived as an implant in the public sphere. It happened a few decades earlier. The word was not new, but now it arrived with a specific charge linked to a specific Agenda (-21, 2030). The word was consensus. It meant: Science now agrees (don’t they?) that the Earth is going to end. It was the cli-i-imate agenda that arrived. However, the consensus pushers ‘forgot’ to tell us that science had been hit in the forehead with a sledge hammer and that their data had been run through a meat grinder and various substances (additives) added. They also ‘forgot’ to tell us that science did not agree at all on what they said science agreed on. They also forgot that science is not about negotiating a consensus, since constructive disagreement is the only productive attitude in a scientific context.

An example of interruption to create politicized agreement. That is exactly what the whole climate misery is: politicized science.
There can be no other reason to interrupt someone or something that is ongoing, in process, and that takes the time it takes. Climate science was a new branch of science that was vulnerable to a political-commercial ambush.

Manipulated Consensus was the very method of the cultural Marxist sect called the Tvind Schools. The students were put on the floor - it was very trendy at the time among both socialists and new-age people. Here they were forced by their teachers, who were trained in this Delphi method, to declare their agreement. If one or two people asked questions during the meeting expression any form of doubt, the meeting continued as a mixture between collective punishment and peer pressure for as long as it took for the poor pupil to collapse and submit.

The revolutionary project, the French, the Russian, the Chinese, the Ottoman, were all about the interruption/disruption of civilizational cultures. They were about destroying traditions, human values, well-being. There was a clique of imperialists, industrialists - today they would be called globalists - who devised in their private clubs and lodges somewhere in England or the USA how they could get hordes of human material to do the work for them of destroying the Empire’s competitors. It worked to a certain extent, and a chapter of their lodge network, the Jacobins, had experimented with it in 1789, where they had a whole bunch of people beheaded so that their fortunes could be stolen. It had to be further systematized, and this time the masses of people had to be set in more active motion than just bloodthirsty spectators at a beheading orgy - while they all thought: well it’s not my head that’s rolling down the sink. Next time they’ll do the dirty work. They did so in 1917. Back then it was called the mob, now it is called the masses.

The revolution interrupted the conversation by setting up politically correct rules for what could be talked about. Only topics that were approved and decreed by the party were politically correct. The rest were given various predicates: reactionary, (petty) bourgeois, false consciousness. Even unscientific was used as a term of abuse, because Marxism had exalted itself to be science (historical materialism), even though it was nothing more than a cunning designer religion.

Of course, people talked together in small homes behind closed doors, but a totalitarian regime is jealous, and you had to be careful who you told what, because just one person was enough to report you to the thought-speech police, and then your life could take a sharp turn for the worse. The post-revolutionary regime carried out systematized thought-speech terror. All censorship contains an element of terror. Not only were your thoughts and your speech, whether oral or written, not conveyed, but intercepted and blocked in transit. You risked reprisals for simply speaking out.

Here we can (un)safely say that it has only gotten worse since then. We now live in a world of extreme surveillance, but not only that, because we live under constant abuse of the monitored data. If something can be abused, it is meant to be abused. A system is what it does. Today, a nasty mix of BigTech giants, intelligence agencies, government control systems and various shady players is right inside your brain and stomach. Your privacy has completely disappeared unless you have established an effective shield around it, and only few people know how to do that.

The conversation that disappeared 1.0

What was the main theme of Operation Terror?
We are talking about the shift in public opinion that took place after 9/11.
It was to stop critical thinking, questioning and the demand for connections.

A new word was implanted for that purpose: conspiracy theory.
It was then forbidden and ridiculed to ask relevant questions and NOT to swallow the official conspiracy theory of the government and the media raw and unsalted-unsweetened.
We were told that terror and terrorists were now everywhere, that we could not see them, and that they had no name. Which was contradictory, because they were given a name, and it was said that they knew where they were hiding. WE just didn’t know, so now we were confused. It’s called gaslighting.
We were told that the American government could, on the other hand, because they had identified them in a split second. Why they hadn’t identified them and prevented the incident a long time ago was a bit unclear. It smelled like dead rats.
We were told that we had better identify with the American government, which said (again-again-again) that they would save the world and introduce their democracy, because now they had started the War on Terror, which included the invasion and destruction of yet another string of countries in the world, which would be for the good of all of us, including the countries they destroyed.

Exactly how destruction was to be construction was not entirely clear.
It was also during this same period that it began to shine through that the word we thought we knew what it meant: democracy, also turned out to be a piece of newspeak. The people’s rule meant the people are governed. Democracy was a theatre play.

The conversation that disappeared 2.0

What was the main theme of Operation Financial Crisis?
It was: Money is not something we talk about. We leave that to the experts, because they know best how to … completely screw up the economy and take advantage of it. The experts and politicians managed to interrupt the conversation so effectively that the conclusion of the collapse was that it was too bad for the banks that they had played high stakes, and that taxpayers now had to pay out to help the poor innocent financiers who didn’t see it coming, because how could they have?

The financial crisis was also an act of terrorism. If we didn’t fork out with a gun to our foreheads, then it would affect us - you know how. If banks were to be held responsible, then people would lose their money and society would come to a standstill - we were told. A kind of sinking-of-The-Titanic argument.

It was a revealing time. Shortly afterwards, the Greek variation of the Financial Crisis arrived. Here it was clear to the attentive viewer and listener that the left wing during the period (code word: Obama) had taken on the character of fascists. This requires an explanation.

Case story: Greece

There was a strong link between finance and the housing market, and in the Greek case it was particularly significant. And thanks to my friend Mads Palsvig (financier, lawyer and trader who was blacklisted for asking close questions to Janet Yellen, among others) for providing a precise pinpoint of this, so I quote-parafrase his analysis:
The Greeks had so far had a fine economy, where families often owned a large family house that was not mortgaged and was in debt up to both ears. There was enough space for the family to move in. This was seen by the speculators in Goldman Sachs and the ECB (European Central Bank) and the IMF/WTO and other globalist bodies. Here there were ‘free’ resources that could be stolen via financialization. So they arranged a national economic collapse for Greece with the control tools they had.

We were told that it was the Greeks’ own fault that they had lived beyond their means and that they were unable to handle their own economy. They were definitely ridiculed. DR = Danmarks Radio (national TV-station) had an egghead program called Deadline for the intellectuals, the creative class, the academics. They did a dirty happening where they misused the Michael Jackson song Africa or rather the Danish subtitle Africa, Africa, it gets better day by day. If we - give a hand to … you may remember. They had perverted it to Greece, Greece, it gets worse day by day. It was simply a perfidious semi-racist mockery of the Greeks, these incompetent brown-faced, low-ranking scumbags who couldn’t keep house. Not only was this happening embarrassing beyond all limits, because it was DR2/Deadline employees who were talentless - it sounded like hell, and they couldn’t hit the right note. The visuals were also completely wrong, for example some bitch in a black dress - black was the intellectual thing back then - lying on a table while she tried to sing. The really embarrassing thing was that the intellectual left-wing heads who had infiltrated DR didn’t get a damn thing about it and willingly braced themselves for propaganda on behalf of the global fascists.

The conversation that disappeared 3.0

What was the main theme of Operation Lockdown?
It was to stop all free conversation and institute a forced non-conversation.

First, we were forced to wear masks.
Did you notice what was happening?
Were you encouraged to talk to another mummy wearing a mask?
Mask = muzzle.

Second, we were forced into isolation.
Isolation = house arrest.
The world became a big open prison of inmates forced into silence.
They called it social distancing.
We couldn’t have a conversation with someone 20 meters away, let alone people who weren’t allowed to go outside a door.

A system is what it does.
If people got lonely, isolated, anxious, then it WAS the system. System = intention.
If people got sick from swabs, masks, and forced experimental vaccines, then it WAS the intention.
If children became paralyzed, withdrew into themselves, became distrustful of adults, threw away two years of their precious childhood and learning, then it WAS the intention.

Operation Lockdown was a global social experiment on how much damage could be done to human interaction. This WAS the intention.

But we were told that the intention was different, that it was for our own sake, that it was to protect us from the end of the world, and that it was for our safety.

We did not understand that those who said such things were not the ones who had initiated such things.

We did not understand that Power always communicates and implements through an intermediate layer that knows something but not much. They are what we usually call: confused on a higher level.

We did not understand how incarnately cunningly malicious the entrepreneurs were.

We did not understand how psychopaths are screwed up in their brain damage.
We did not understand that a state of emergency was their only option to bypass all accepted and time-honored practices for exercising common sense.
We did not understand that emergency was a compensation for the complete lack of legitimacy.
We understood NOTHING, even though a stack of red lights were flashing in the back of our minds.

The New Normal was their attempt to make a sick social psychological mass psychosis everyday. And we did not understand it.

There have been 1000s of studies conducted under the surface into the effects of the GMO assault that took place. A whole battery of red lights is shining.

The conversation that disappeared 4.0

What was/is the main theme of Operation WW3?
We are talking about the culmination of an era, so let’s limit the topic.
WW3 is a hybrid war, a liquid war, total war, 4th generation warfare (or gradually 5th).
It reveals itself as a globalist operation, where the warlords reveal themselves. It is not some evil warlord or a hostile nation that is our real enemy. It is the rulers, it is the governments, it is their bodies and institutions. It is the globalists who have always dreamed of absolute power and that now control the governments.
WW3 is a vertical war, not a horizontal war. It is the upper echelons of the ruling class against the lower echelons of the population that are the fronts of the war.

So there is not one main theme but a series of main themes.
The interruption of ALL HEALTHY AND MEANINGFUL CONVERSATION is one of the primary means of action.
It is important to understand that those in power are afraid, they are scared out of their wits and minds of their own people.
They are indeed arrogant on the surface and like to appear fearless, but that is only a fragile facade.
They present themselves as untouchable, but tapping into their internal palaces shows that they are now in full panic. They are currently experiencing a dismantling of their globalist agenda that makes them shake in their pants.

The attack on Libya and Syria was the prelude. They managed to smash Libya, but in Syria they were seen and met serious resistance. Then the punitive action against Russia began, which helped Syria and smashed ISIS. The Ukraine operation was launched when Operation Shutdown was running out of gas.

So once again, disruption was the main theme. It was about breaking the Europeans’ relationship with Russia. Especially Germany’s. For those who have studied the First and Second World Wars and dug deep enough, there is a sense of déjà vu. It was exactly the same disruption that was at the heart of the first two world wars and the revolution. The British Empire knew that there was a natural-cultural connection between Germany and Russia. Germany had the technological-industrial capacity, Russia had all the resources. Together they would form a powerhouse of production-trade-and-action power. Both were successful empires, but the Empire of Envy was, as the term implies: envious. They did not allow any dominant empires other than their own to enjoy any kind of well-being. They did not even allow their own inhabitants to enjoy well-being.

The British Empire and their establishment have formulated it themselves. We only need to read what they wrote and said and then take it seriously. We have it from the horses mouth. They saw themselves as the rightful heirs of the Roman Empire, the primary empire of antiquity, which saw all other civilizations as enemies to be subjugated and drained of resources. The Romans had the right to do so, because they were Darwinists before Darwin: they had the right to destroy the weak. They called their emperor God. They were proto-fascists, or as their adepts the fascists said: There is nothing above the State. Or as the state-within-the-state that Il Duce reestablished as a politically sovereign state would say: There is nothing above the Pope, because he is God’s representative on Earth, and God has gone on a charter vacation and is not coming back anytime soon.

There is nothing as disruptive as a war. It destroys the human society that has been built up. It traumatizes people and makes them forget where they came from. And when they are about to remember it again, they get another war on their shoulders.

How do you think it’s going?

According to the globalists, the process should be complete today.
It is not so, because too much got in the way.
According to them, we should now be at the end of Hillary Clinton’s second term as president, and thus the 16-year plan should be fully implemented.

As the saying goes: He who lives by the sword will die by the sword.
Paraphrased as: He who lives by interruption will himself be interrupted.

In times of such massive censorship to interrupt all conversation, it is becoming overwhelmingly clear to more and more people what is happening. The interruption is noticeable to a significant degree. Of course, there are lots of people who duck their necks, bow down to Power and otherwise have no idea what they are experiencing. They cannot possibly avoid experiencing, but if you are a faithful subscriber to official explanations regardless of how sick they are, then it is possible to explain away your experiences to the bitter end.

One of several scenes from The Matrix (1) has become ingrained. You know what I mean when I say:
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a phone call when you are unable to speak?

One thing is censorship. It is intended for people with educated (= dangerous) minds who open their mouths to speak. What is even worse, if possible, is that people have become unable to speak and express an opinion, because they simply have not formed an opinion. They have misunderstood opinion formation and confused it with opinion downloading.
No real conversation takes place when people sit around like automatons quoting downloaded talking points, sound bites, tape loops, one-liners, clichés.
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is speech when you have nothing to bring to a conversation and nothing to take away?

Dirty Harry would agree on that saying: Opinions are like assholes, everyone’s got one.

One of my favorite YouTubers, Praveen Mohan, is now being vehemently censored by BigTech. Over the years, he has developed into one of the most excellent connoisseurs of the immensely rich Indian temple art. He goes straight into a temple and reads it, like the rest of us read a book or watch a film. YouTube uses the absurd pretext to hit him: that he shows what is there. The ancient Indians were not afraid to depict violent scenes, let alone scantily clad people with excellent attributes engaged in erotic activities. YouTube claims that this violates their censorship policy. YouTube has nothing against showing pop stars who twerk their asses and tits right up to the camera’s head or MMA fights where people get their faces refurnished or car chases in the streets of Los Angeles, where police-glorifying TV channels make a living by filming smash-up porn on the freeways.

AI’s war against humanity

The hypocrisy is screaming to the heavens, so it’s something else. The history and archaeology mafia has simply reported Praveen Mohan to the BigTech censorship police to shut him up. They are jealous that he knows more about the subject than their entire army of buffoons. AND - which is quite crucial - that he has no shaky ties to their amputated storytelling and is therefore able to intelligently read into the core. He also has the extremely sympathetic practice at the end of many of his informative videos of saying: What do you think? Tell me about it in your comments below.

This is where we are going, this is the kind of thing we need a LOT more of!
Praveen has an interesting way of explaining the phenomenon.
This is the AI’s war on humanity.

Speaking of The Matrix, it reminds me of both this and another sci-fi classic Terminator 2 *.
Both have as a main theme the war between The Machine World and humanity.
It’s happening right now. An ultra-perfidious conversation stopper is when we are forced into pseudo-dialogue with artificial intelligence.
We think we are having a conversation, but we are just running an echo chamber.
The machine repeats what we say, and we repeat what the machine says.

As a neighbor of mine with a decades-long career at IBM writes in one of his books:
With AI, we can only get dumber and dumber. Because AI (machine learning) can only look back and compress-reduce what it ‘learns’.

* Not many people realize that The Matrix and Terminator 2 were originally the same script written by the same black female screenwriter, Sophia Stewart. She was never credited for it, as Warner Brothers stole the script, rewrote it, and split it up.
It’s the same thing that happened when word processing programs became public property, only on multi-steroids!

People back then thought that when a machine that could layout a page of text so that it looked like a book publication, they suddenly became good at writing. NO! They became worse, because the illusion that the machine also provided form, content and linguistic finesse + simple grammar and spelling meant that they never developed beyond the 7th grade of elementary school.
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good does it do you when you are a functional illiterate?

The same thing happened with digital photography. And today, with everyone’s super camera at their fingertips on an expensive, fancy iPhone, people think they are professional photo and film photographers. 99% of what comes out of it is visual junk. And no, I’m not underestimating the value of potential OpenSource documentary at your fingertips, where visual finish is irrelevant - and it exists.
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what can your expensive mobile teddy bear do to you when you’re unable to see?

The same thing happened when sequencer-sampler-loop music programs came along. People suddenly became musicians, even though their understanding of music as a medium was blunted. Result: oceans of crappy non-music with autotuner robot voices compensating for designer clones who can’t sing, ridiculous lyrics cut over the same bad cliché spit out by recording studios that can do something with sound. And THAT they can! But ‘sound’ is only one isolated component of music.
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is all your gear if you can’t sing and dance and don’t have a song for the world?

And now AI is coming into the field. People are freaking out about it, because YES! now the robots are coming and doing it all for us, and look, I just pressed a button, and now it has done my schoolwork!
Imagine how stupid the high school students of the future could be. And their teachers can’t do anything about it in their daily lives. They can only observe that some students waste half and whole years not learning a damn thing, after which they go to exams and reveal themselves in all their misery. One can only hope that they incorporate it into their teaching to show the students how much damage they are doing to themselves.

Pseudo-communikation

Social media can be used consciously and attentively. But it has a dark side, and this side is all too evident. Together with this potent device that everyone has in their hands these days: the smartphone, everyone is (almost) now equipped with a hybrid between, dog tags, anklets, implanted listening devices. The mobile teddy bear was a test laboratory for techno-control of people.

A particular side effect that is not even a side effect but an EFFECT is that people’s body posture has become hunched over. People walk around the street, sit in public transport, sit in cafes, sit at dinners and other real social events with their necks hunched over. The teddy bear is the new navel that is being poked in, and the effect is on the muscles of the body, as if they were walking around with a slave’s yoke over their necks.

It is a terrifyingly effective disruptor / interrupter for real togetherness. Instead of conversations, we send stupid little beeps to each other. Twitter-twitter-X-X, beep-beep. smiley, LoL Lots of Laughter, Lack of Life. - to paraphrase a classic Burning Red Ivanhoe song. As useful as the gadget can be, it is just as harmful. People lose their lives and mobility in traffic while masturbating with their mobile dildos. The girls develop anxiety about not being ‘on’ all the time, because if they don’t respond to beep-beep right away, they will probably be socially ostracized. As a cyclist in Copenhagen, I witnessed the typical scene every day: She arrives on her bike at a red traffic light during rush hour. In the 30 seconds it takes for the light to turn green, she has her teddy bear out of her pocket to see if anything has ticked in. A study of the effect of social media on women/girls, who are by nature super-social beings, has shown that many develop anxiety and stress. In vulnerable age groups, this can develop into suicidal thoughts.

While people imagine themselves to be very connected, they are as isolated and lonely as ever. An interesting counter-trend to all the social network hyper-pressure is: The DumbPhone. In other words, a radical reaction to The SmartPhone, a mobile phone that can only do the most basic things. The trend is among young people, which makes it doubly interesting. So there is a movement underway to understand and counteract what Generation Millennials and younger have been subjected to. In other words, there is still hope for the most brainwashed generation to date, Generation Selfie, Generation MeMeMe, the narcissist generation.

NB! This is NOT a mockery of an entire generation, it is an empathetic, albeit head-shaking, statement that someone had singled out this generation as the target for the final implementation of their project. It was estimated that they were now so infected by tech-devices, social-engineering, cultural Marxism, fakeness, brain death, tribalism, cancel-culture, neo-racism, neo-fascism, and that they were so boiled, and that they would not discover it.
It is also in memory of WHO were the primary entrepreneurs of the project, which are the baby boomers, Generation 68, the first seriously fucked-up cultural Marxist-infected generation. So it does not come from strangers but is inherited-amplified over 3 generations.

New Speak - concept perversion

In short: The generation was ‘activated’ as sleeping cells and sent off as yet another cultural weapon of mass destruction. With the epicenter in the USA from 2016 and especially based in American universities and their neo-Marxist teachers, they created cancel culture, insult culture, Black Lives Matter, Antifa, critical race theory, LGBTQ…ism and pumped out premeditated abstract concepts such as intersectionalism, systemic racism, microaggression, hate speech, white supremacy, concepts that were all new speak and meant the opposite of what the word said: Antifa meant that the supporters could now perform fascism, Black Lives Matter shit!, white supremacy meant that now they are the ones who carry out totalitarian-dictatorial supremacy, critical race theory meant that now racism was back on the field with new clothes, microaggression meant that now they are allowed to commit aggression against their hate object, condemnation of hate speech meant that now they carried out hate speech from morning to night, while calling it something else. It is psychological projection put into a system and on steroids. Everything they throw in the face of others is what they themselves do.

New Speak is a poison to all healthy conversation and concept formation. It is weaponized and manipulative language. It is a special … one feels like using the word satanic language, which turns everything upside down like Satanism, where good is evil and evil is good. It is linguistic seduction. It is also as the Sabbateans put it: Since God created both good and evil, we pay homage to God’s creation and participate in the project by practicing evil. The more evil, the better. We put a spell on you. - in English there is this double meaning of the word spell: to spell, to bewitch.

The antidote is elaborate, but there is no way around it. When people put these words in their mouths, we have to stop and say something like: Wait a minute. Before we go any further, could you please define the term, because I’m not sure you mean the same thing as I do.

Interruption of experience

The young are unprotected. They do not have enough life experience to understand what they are exposing themselves to.
The cultural ideologists have preached that just being young is a qualification in itself.
The baby boomer generation imagined - and preached - that ONLY the young could understand the world, and that everyone older than 30 (isn’t that young?) was lost and should be thrown in the trash. That was the predicate of cultural Marxism and a call for a generation gap, as it was called. If it was possible to amputate young people from their parents, then the young people were open to influence.

The interruption had identified all culturally preserving and reinforcing ties and devised how they could be set against each other:
parents - children
youth - old
woman - man
new - old
fringe - fringe-world
preserving - renewing
skin color - skin color
nation - nation
ethno - ethno
faith - faith
culture - culture
left - right

ALL possibilities for conflict, division, hatred and subsequent war were used as a cultural weapon.
Remember again that the Real Warring Power is not a nation whose enemy is another nation.
The warring power is the Global Ruling Class. Its real enemy is… you! Or humanity. When all the little peeing ants down there in the gravel are fighting each other, no one notices that it is US who is standing there pissing in the anthill.

It was interesting that Operation Lockdown had as its primary target group: the elderly.
The elderly died like flies when exposed to the now-amplified flu - because that’s what it was.
This part of the operation was about interrupting tradition = the ancient conversation between old = experience and young = development via euthanasia.

When a new generation is relegated to reinventing the soup spoon, the deep plate, the fire and the wheel, they use all their strength and energy on it. They are culturally bombed back to the Stone Age. They imagine themselves to be oh-so-innovative, but in reality they are helpless bums, and all their ‘geniuses’ are early stages of something that was discovered-invented-developed decades-centuries and even millennia ago.
Definition of tradition: Experiments that worked.
Definition of progressive innovation: Experiments without a guarantee of success.
We live in a self-deceiving designer culture that has focused exclusively on the latest.
What could go wrong?
Answer: EVERYTHING that’s going wrong right now!

The Tradition

Tradition is the Great Conversation between generations.
If this conversation disappears, if dark forces succeed in destroying it,
then humanity will cease to exist.

That will not happen.
For we are in the process of resuming the lost conversation.
Keep a close eye on incoming attempts at poisoning and coups of conversations.
Do not settle for interruptions but resume-resume-resume.
The repressive world order, in all its apparent power and might, is as weak as ever.